As title, how hard is it really to design a brand new Instruction Set Architecture from the ground up? Let's say, hypothetically, the goal was to create something that could genuinely rival RISC-V in terms of capabilities and potential adoption.
Could a solo developer realistically pull this off in a short timeframe, like a single university semester?
My gut says "probably not," but I'd like to hear your thoughts. What are the biggest hurdles? Is it just defining the instructions, or is the ecosystem (compilers, toolchains, community support) the real beast? Why would or wouldn't this be feasible?
As title, how hard is it really to design a brand new Instruction Set Architecture from the ground up? Let's say, hypothetically, the goal was to create something that could genuinely rival RISC-V in terms of capabilities and potential adoption.
Could a solo developer realistically pull this off in a short timeframe, like a single university semester?
My gut says "probably not," but I'd like to hear your thoughts. What are the biggest hurdles? Is it just defining the instructions, or is the ecosystem (compilers, toolchains, community support) the real beast? Why would or wouldn't this be feasible?
In general, many financial experts support their clients’ desire to buy cryptocurrency, but they don’t recommend it unless clients express interest. “The biggest concern for us is if someone wants to invest in crypto and the investment they choose doesn’t do well, and then all of a sudden they can’t send their kids to college,” says Ian Harvey, a certified financial planner (CFP) in New York City. “Then it wasn’t worth the risk.” The speculative nature of cryptocurrency leads some planners to recommend it for clients’ “side” investments. “Some call it a Vegas account,” says Scott Hammel, a CFP in Dallas. “Let’s keep this away from our real long-term perspective, make sure it doesn’t become too large a portion of your portfolio.” In a very real sense, Bitcoin is like a single stock, and advisors wouldn’t recommend putting a sizable part of your portfolio into any one company. At most, planners suggest putting no more than 1% to 10% into Bitcoin if you’re passionate about it. “If it was one stock, you would never allocate any significant portion of your portfolio to it,” Hammel says.
That growth environment will include rising inflation and interest rates. Those upward shifts naturally accompany healthy growth periods as the demand for resources, products and services rise. Importantly, the Federal Reserve has laid out the rationale for not interfering with that natural growth transition.It's not exactly a fad, but there is a widespread willingness to pay up for a growth story. Classic fundamental analysis takes a back seat. Even negative earnings are ignored. In fact, positive earnings seem to be a limiting measure, producing the question, "Is that all you've got?" The preference is a vision of untold riches when the exciting story plays out as expected.
